| Re: Re: issue: lifetimes of keys internal to EAP methods | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Yoshihiro Ohba (yohba |
|
| Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 09:11:14 -0400 (EDT) | |
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:47:05PM +0300, Jari Arkko wrote: > Yoshihiro Ohba wrote: > > >>(2) The text does not cater for changing TEKs during an > >>EAP method run. I know its far-fetched given that EAP is > >>not the world's best protocol transporting large quantities > >>of information. But it shouldn't be disallowed either. > > > > > > OK. But where is "changing TEKs" mentioned in your proposed text? > > It wasn't directly, but I added "typically" so we still leave > some space for this to happen: > > "They typically remain valid only for the duration of > the EAP conversation, and are lost once the EAP conversation > completes." > > Do you think it should be more explicit? I see. If there is a typical existing EAP method that does this "typical" thing, I think the proposed text is ok. But it there such a typical EAP method? (I may be wrong) Yoshihiro Ohba > > --Jari > _______________________________________________ > eap mailing list > eap [at] frascone.com > http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
-
issue: lifetimes of keys internal to EAP methods Jari Arkko, October 22 2004
-
Re: issue: lifetimes of keys internal to EAP methods Yoshihiro Ohba, October 22 2004
-
Re: issue: lifetimes of keys internal to EAP methods Jari Arkko, October 22 2004
- Re: Re: issue: lifetimes of keys internal to EAP methods Yoshihiro Ohba, October 23 2004
- Re: Re: issue: lifetimes of keys internal to EAP methods Jari Arkko, October 24 2004
-
Re: issue: lifetimes of keys internal to EAP methods Jari Arkko, October 22 2004
-
Re: issue: lifetimes of keys internal to EAP methods Yoshihiro Ohba, October 22 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.