| Issue 267: PRF Negotiation | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba |
|
| Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:34:25 -0400 (EDT) | |
Issue 267: PRF Negotiation Submitter name: Florent Bersani Submitter email address: florent.bersani [at] rd.francetelecom.fr Date first submitted: 10/2/2004 Reference: Document: Keying-03 Comment type: T Priority: S Section: Appendix F Rationale/Explanation of issue Appendix F.1 IIRC we had a discussion whether the prf used to derive AMSK should be mandated or could be negotiated (http://mail.frascone.com/pipermail/eap/2004-March/002384.html). There is a trade off between the two options (simplicity & interoperability are in favor of mandating one but not putting a mandatory requirement on peers and servers favors allowing negotiation). This is not reflected in the current appendix. I'd like some more discussion on the matter....
-
Issue 267: PRF Negotiation Bernard Aboba, October 19 2004
-
Re: Issue 267: PRF Negotiation Bernard Aboba, October 19 2004
-
RE: Re: Issue 267: PRF Negotiation Joseph Salowey, October 24 2004
- Re: Re: Issue 267: PRF Negotiation Jari Arkko, October 26 2004
-
RE: Re: Issue 267: PRF Negotiation Joseph Salowey, October 24 2004
-
Re: Issue 267: PRF Negotiation Bernard Aboba, October 19 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.