| RE: EAP-AKA review | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: henry.haverinen (henry.haverinen |
|
| Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 10:56:21 -0400 (EDT) | |
Yoshihiro, > RFC 3748 does not specify when to send an EAP-Request/Notification. > If EAP-AKA allows EAP Notification, but does not specify when to sent, > there is no specification so far that defines when to send an > EAP-Request/Notification during EAP-AKA. It seems that there are two > choices: > > (a) Have an explicit text saying that EAP-AKA does not prohibit EAP > Notification but it is out of the scope of the document as to when an > EAP-Request/Notification is sent within EAP-AKA. > > (b) Just prohibit EAP Notifications during EAP-AKA. > > My personal preference is (b) for simplicity unless there is specific > reason to allow EAP Notification during EAP-AKA in addition to > AKA-Notifications. I agree that these are the choices we have. In case (a) we should also have explicit text saying that EAP-AKA does not protect EAP Notifications. I'm fine either way. I agree that (b) would be simpler. I'm not able to convince myself that (a) would never be useful -- for example if EAP-AKA is run within a tunneling method. So if it was up to me I'd choose (a). Best regards, Henry
- RE: EAP-AKA review, (continued)
-
RE: EAP-AKA review henry.haverinen, October 12 2004
-
Re: EAP-AKA review Jari Arkko, October 12 2004
- Re: EAP-AKA review Yoshihiro Ohba, October 12 2004
- EAP Notification MICs in RFC 3748 (Was: Re: [eap] EAP-AKA review) Jari Arkko, October 12 2004
-
Re: EAP-AKA review Jari Arkko, October 12 2004
- RE: EAP-AKA review henry.haverinen, October 12 2004
-
RE: EAP-AKA review henry.haverinen, October 12 2004
-
RE: EAP-AKA review henry.haverinen, October 15 2004
- Re: EAP-AKA review Yoshihiro Ohba, October 15 2004
-
RE: Re: EAP-AKA review henry.haverinen, October 17 2004
- Re: Re: EAP-AKA review Yoshihiro Ohba, October 17 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.