| Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Florent Bersani (florent.bersani |
|
| Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 02:38:22 -0400 (EDT) | |
Thomas Otto wrote:
Am Mittwoch 06 Oktober 2004 11:10 schrieb Florent Bersani:
So we would now have an even bushier jungle of EAP methods: o those which do not derive keys o those which derive keys but do not speak of EMSK... e.g. EAP-TLS o those which derive MSK and EMSK but do not name them o those which derive MSK and EMSK but do not name them
:-(((
The last two items ... should it be
o those which derive MSK and EMSK and name them ?
Yes, the last two bullets should indeed read: <>o those which derive MSK and EMSK but do not name them o those which derive MSK and EMSK and name them
Thanks for spotting this typo and my apologies for making it!
- Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks, (continued)
- Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Florent Bersani, October 6 2004
- RE: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Joseph Salowey, October 6 2004
- Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Jari Arkko, October 7 2004
- Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Thomas Otto, October 6 2004
- Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Florent Bersani, October 6 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.