Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks
From: Thomas Otto (t.ottosharevolution.de)
Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:55:30 -0400 (EDT)
Am Mittwoch 06 Oktober 2004 11:10 schrieb Florent Bersani:

> So we would now have an even bushier jungle of EAP methods:
> o those which do not derive keys
> o those which derive keys but do not speak of EMSK... e.g. EAP-TLS
> o those which derive MSK and EMSK but do not name them
> o those which derive MSK and EMSK but do not name them
>
> :-(((

The last two items ... should it be
o those which derive MSK and EMSK and name them ?


Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.