| Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Thomas Otto (t.otto |
|
| Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 16:55:30 -0400 (EDT) | |
Am Mittwoch 06 Oktober 2004 11:10 schrieb Florent Bersani: > So we would now have an even bushier jungle of EAP methods: > o those which do not derive keys > o those which derive keys but do not speak of EMSK... e.g. EAP-TLS > o those which derive MSK and EMSK but do not name them > o those which derive MSK and EMSK but do not name them > > :-((( The last two items ... should it be o those which derive MSK and EMSK and name them ?
- RE: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks, (continued)
- RE: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Joseph Salowey, October 5 2004
- Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Florent Bersani, October 6 2004
- RE: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Joseph Salowey, October 6 2004
- Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Jari Arkko, October 7 2004
- Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Thomas Otto, October 6 2004
- Re: Issue on eap-keying: naming of AMSks Florent Bersani, October 6 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.