| Re: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Florent Bersani (florent.bersani |
|
| Date: Wed, 6 Oct 2004 04:59:29 -0400 (EDT) | |
A humorous note on this one: I like the way Bernard tracked it
Issue 266 status is now rejected as a duplicate of... issue 275
In my narrow-minded western vision of the flowing of time, I'd have put that the other way round.... ;-)
Florent
Joseph Salowey wrote:
Issue 266 status is now rejected as a duplicate of... issue 275
In my narrow-minded western vision of the flowing of time, I'd have put that the other way round.... ;-)
Florent
Joseph Salowey wrote:
Florent Bersani wrote:
Joe,
I believe this is tracked as Issue 266
(http://www.drizzle.com/~aboba/EAP/eapissues.html#Issue%20266) isn't
it?
[Joe] Yes it is, we can merge them. I think there still is the whole issue whole issue of the AAA-Key usage in fast handoff which is currently under discussion.
-
Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Joseph Salowey, October 4 2004
-
Re: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Florent Bersani, October 4 2004
-
RE: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Joseph Salowey, October 5 2004
- Re: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Florent Bersani, October 6 2004
-
RE: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Joseph Salowey, October 5 2004
-
Re: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Florent Bersani, October 4 2004
-
Re: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Jari Arkko, October 5 2004
- RE: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Joseph Salowey, October 5 2004
-
Re: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Florent Bersani, October 5 2004
- RE: Issue: AAA-Key should be derived from AMSK Joseph Salowey, October 5 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.