| Re: Re: Review process for EAP SIM/AKA | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:25:51 -0400 (EDT) | |
That's right Florent, you did volunteer. I'm sorry but there's been a bit of confusion in this matter, due to lack of communication on my part. I should have told you and the list what's going on but didn't get to it. Back in August we asked for volunteers and also did some thinking of our own of who might be a good reviewer. I managed to convince Bernard that he should be the expert reviewer for these two documents. However, he's become busy due to some other reasons and can now review only one of the documents, EAP-SIM. This means the expert position for EAP-AKA is open again.
Note: given that we'd like to complete the review and any corrections before the I-D deadlines (and pending 3GPP deadlines), we are in a hurry with the reviews at this point.
By the way, just as a clarification: we need one formal "expert" for EAP methods when we review them, but other reviews from the WG are also most welcome. If you or others have comments on these documents, please speak now.
--Jari
-
Review process for EAP SIM/AKA Bernard Aboba, August 23 2004
-
Re: Review process for EAP SIM/AKA Bernard Aboba, September 20 2004
-
Re: Re: Review process for EAP SIM/AKA Florent Bersani, September 21 2004
- Re: Re: Review process for EAP SIM/AKA Jari Arkko, September 21 2004
-
Re: Re: Review process for EAP SIM/AKA Florent Bersani, September 21 2004
-
Re: Review process for EAP SIM/AKA Bernard Aboba, September 20 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.