| RE: Re: method identification | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Suresh (sureshvv |
|
| Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 02:55:38 -0400 (EDT) | |
-----Original Message----- From: eap-admin [at] frascone.com [mailto:eap-admin [at] frascone.com]On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 12:03 AM To: eap [at] frascone.com Subject: [eap] Re: method identification > I have the following two questions? Kindly clarify. > > Question 1 > This is regarding EAP behaving as a relay. RFC-3579 (RADIUS support for EAP) > states, that NAS can send a RADIUS access request with EAP-Start attribute > to the RADIUS server. [BA] This is not the typical mode because it implies that the NAS will be sending an Access-Request every time a user connects, even if they cannot respond to an Identity Request. So if there are hosts that don't support EAP, this generates a high RADIUS server load. I think, NAS and client will know what type of authetication method that they want to go for. Without knowing what authentication to be used, I am unable to visualize how NAS starts that particular method negotiation. And for each user that connects to the NAS, I think there is no need to send a RADIUS access request with EAP-Start attribute. If the NAS and the client negotiates to go for EAP, then only NAS sends a RADIUS access request with EAP-Start attribute to the RADIUS server. This is what I have seen in IKEv2 using EAP as mutual authentication. The initiator in IKEv2 desires to go for EAP authentication by sending third message without AUTH payload. I think it is similar in case of PPP. Is there any exception? > How does the NAS inform the RADIUS server, to frame a particular > method specific start request for the above sent Access request? i.e. how > does the NAS informs the RADIUS server that a particular method > functionality is required? [BA]In RADIUS/EAP, the NAS acts as a passthrough so it lets the RADIUS server make that determination. Does it means that there exists a policy in RADIUS which will specify what method has to be selected for the particular ID received in EAP-Response/Identity. > What I understood from the RFC is that, RADIUS server may frame EAP-ID > request and to that client responds. Based on the ID received, the RADIUS > server identifies an EAP-Method i.e. ID very specific to the method. Is > there any specific reason that, there is no attribute in the RADIUS Access > Request to identify an EAP-method to be used by the RADIUS server, so that > identity will be independant of method? Kindly clarify. [BA]The EAP-Request/Identity is independent of the EAP method. There is no attribute to request an EAP method because the NAS acts as a passthrough in RADIUS/EAP. Yes, it is true that EAP-Request/Identity is independant of EAP method. Is the identity received in the EAP-Response/Identity is specific to a method? Based on the identity received, does the RADIUS server identify that a particular EAP method has to be used? > Question 2 > How does the RADIUS server keeps track of each EAP authentication context? > Is there any concept of re-authentication, in Client-NAS mutual > authentication using EAP? i.e. Can RADIUS server identify a particular > connection has already authenticated, and it is going for re-uthentication. Typically the RADIUS server keeps track of the context via a State attribute. Reauthentication is supported via the Session-Timeout attribute in RADIUS, as explained in RFC 3580. Since a re-authentication looks exactly like a regular authentication, there is typically no need for the RADIUS to distinguish between them. Thank you very much for the clarification. _______________________________________________ eap mailing list eap [at] frascone.com http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
-
Re: method identification Bernard Aboba, August 25 2004
- RE: Re: method identification Suresh, August 25 2004
-
RE: Re: method identification Bernard Aboba, August 26 2004
- RE: Re: method identification Suresh, August 27 2004
-
Re: method identification Thomas Otto, August 28 2004
- Re: Re: method identification Jari Arkko, August 29 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.