| Re: Re: Issue 251 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Nick Petroni (npetroni |
|
| Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 10:59:08 -0400 (EDT) | |
> 802.1X "canned" messages are encapsulated EAP packets. So an 802.1X > packet containing an EAP Success is expressly forbidden under RFC 3748, > even though I think it is still mentioned in IEEE 802.1X-2004. Similarly, > our discussion of whether "canned" EAP Failure is illegal also applies to > "canned" 802.1X packets. Ok, this was the source of my confusion. I guess I assumed that since they were in another standard they were going to be allowed for backwards compatibility or some other legacy argument. They are, indeed, still in the latest version, which was another source of my confusion. They are in the 802.1X SM diagrams, not just the text. Thanks, nick >
-
Re: Issue 251 Bernard Aboba, July 24 2004
-
Re: Re: Issue 251 Nick Petroni, July 27 2004
-
Re: Re: Issue 251 Bernard Aboba, July 27 2004
- Re: Re: Issue 251 Nick Petroni, July 27 2004
-
Re: Re: Issue 251 Bernard Aboba, July 27 2004
-
Re: Re: Issue 251 Nick Petroni, July 27 2004
-
RE: Re: Issue 251 Congdon, Paul T (ProCurve), July 27 2004
-
RE: Re: Issue 251 Nick Petroni, July 27 2004
- Re: Re: Issue 251 Jim Burns, July 27 2004
- Re: Re: Issue 251 Yoshihiro Ohba, July 28 2004
-
RE: Re: Issue 251 Nick Petroni, July 27 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.