Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4
From: Nick Petroni (npetronics.umd.edu)
Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:56:41 -0400 (EDT)
> >Comment #10 - Technical
> >  - change the text of TIMEOUT_FAILURE in section 5.5 and
> >    TIMEOUT_FAILURE2 in section 7.5 to the following:
> >  "A final state indicating failure because no response has been
> >   received. Because no response was received, no new message
> >   (including failure) should be sent to the peer."
> >
> >
> Great!
> Perhaps even a little bit that text by appending: "this is why this
> state needs to be distinct of the FAILURE state"
Sure, it's fine with me. I think it could be determined by reading the
states themselves, but this text is by no means excessive.

nick


Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.