| Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Nick Petroni (npetroni |
|
| Date: Fri, 16 Jul 2004 11:56:41 -0400 (EDT) | |
> >Comment #10 - Technical > > - change the text of TIMEOUT_FAILURE in section 5.5 and > > TIMEOUT_FAILURE2 in section 7.5 to the following: > > "A final state indicating failure because no response has been > > received. Because no response was received, no new message > > (including failure) should be sent to the peer." > > > > > Great! > Perhaps even a little bit that text by appending: "this is why this > state needs to be distinct of the FAILURE state" Sure, it's fine with me. I think it could be determined by reading the states themselves, but this text is by no means excessive. nick
- Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4, (continued)
-
Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4 Florent Bersani, July 16 2004
- Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4 Nick Petroni, July 16 2004
- Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4 John Vollbrecht, July 22 2004
-
Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4 Florent Bersani, July 16 2004
-
Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4 Florent Bersani, July 16 2004
- Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4 Nick Petroni, July 16 2004
- Re: [Issue 248] Comments on EAP state machine v4 Nick Petroni, July 16 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.