eap Mailing List: RE: some comments to draft-adrangi-eap-network-discovery-and-selection-01.txt

[Adrangi, Farid (farid.adrangi]

Thanks Jari for reposting this mail.

Hello Tomas,
Thanks for your comments and the issues that you pointed out.  After reading 
through your mail, I believe that all of your comments and issues have been 
addressed in the latest version of the draft : 
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-adrangi-eap-network-discovery-01.txt 
.  Could you please confirm that?  Please let me know if you have any questions.
BR,
Farid


t
> 
> 
> 
> (I sending this e-mail on behalf of Tomas Goldbeck-Lowe who
> has reviewed Farid's draft, but his posting to the list
> failed. Sorry if you get this twice.)
> 
> Hi Farid and all,
>  >
>  > Reading the new version of the draft about EAP based network
>  > discovery and selection. Sending this email to let you know
>  > that I'm quite happy with draft as it looks now, and I
>  > believe it will fit into the 3GPP-WLAN architecture.
>  >
>  >
>  > Some questions though for my clarification:
>  > 1. Page 7, Decorated NAI; The text talks about that "It may
>  > include information for several Mediating Networks to be
>  > indicated on the route to the Home Service Network."
>  > However, I don't seen anywhere else in the draft support when
>  > the Decorated NAI includes multiple MN's. I assume we then
>  > use the syntax
>  > 'mediating-net-2!home-realm!username [at] mediating-net-1'. Is
>  > this correct?
>  > Also, I my understanding we then must specify that a AAA
>  > supporting this functionality only moves the first realm in
>  > the username (i.e. if the decorated NAI looks like
>  > 'mediating-net-2!home-realm!username [at] mediating-net-1' the AAA
>  > in mediating-net-1 must "re-shuffle" the NAI to
>  > 'home-realm!username [at] mediating-net-2') before the packet is
>  > passed on. Or am I missing something?
>  >
>  > 2. Solution option 1 and 2 includes the con that "It MAY
>  > introduce a contention problem if space in the Type-Data
>  > field has already been used up for other purposes.  "
>  > Can you explain why this is not true also for option 3?
>  >
>  >
>  > and some editorials:
>  > The following sections/paragraphs includes strange characters
>  > both on my screen and in my printout:
>  > a. Page 2, Introduction, second paragraph; the sentence in
>  > the parenthesis starting with  "(i.e., öRoaming Partnerö ..."
>  >
>  > b. Page 2, Section 1.1; "(referred to as the öEAP over 
> RADIUSö [4]) "
>  >
>  > c. Page 7, Access Point; "öA station that ..."
>  >            RADIUS Server; "öThis is a server ..."
>  >            Service Set ID; "öan identifier attached ..."
>  >
>  > d. Page 13, "[Option 3] û Use a subsequent ..."
>  >
>  > e. Page 17, Section 2.3, NAI Decoration; lots of funny 
> characters...
>  >
>  > f. Reference [10]; I believe it is missing the file name and
>  > 'work in progress', no?
>  >
>  >
>  > Kind regards,
>  >    --> Tomas
>