| Re: [Issue 250] Two more issues from the state machine | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Nick Petroni (npetroni cs.umd.edu)
|
|
| Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 10:55:26 -0400 (EDT) | |
> Issue #TBC > > Submitter name: Florent Bersani > > Submitter email address: florent.bersani [at] rd.francetelecom.fr > > Date first submitted: 06/25/2004 > > Document: Document Requiring change State Machine > > Comment type: E > > Priority: '1' Should fix > > Rationale/Explanation of issue: > allowMethod is not defined in the document IINM but is used in figure 3 > > Requested change: define it I propose to add the following to section 4.4 "allowMethod() Determine if it is allowable for the peer to perform the proposd method. This decision may be based on policy and/or implementation support for the proposed method."
-
Two more issues from the state machine Florent Bersani, June 25 2004
- Re: [Issue 250] Two more issues from the state machine Nick Petroni, July 8 2004
- Re: [Issue 250] Two more issues from the state machine Florent Bersani, July 9 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.