| RE: Resolution to Issue 243? | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Joseph Salowey (jsalowey |
|
| Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:37:18 -0400 (EDT) | |
I think the state synchronization should be in relation to the state of the authentication protocol and not to things that happen external to the authentication protocol such as the EAP method negotiation that happens before the method starts. I don't currently see a requirement to authenticate EAP protocol numbers as they are outside the actual authentication protocol. Anything that is internal the method must be synchronized including the protocol version number. The two sides must agree upon the data exchanged and established within the authentication protocol. Joe eap-admin [at] frascone.com wrote: > At this point, publication of draft-walker-ieee802-req is > being held up, pending resolution of Issue 243: Clarification of > State Synchronization. > > Do we have a proposed resolution of this issue, or at least > proposed text? _______________________________________________ eap > mailing list eap [at] frascone.com > http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
-
Resolution to Issue 243? Bernard Aboba, July 5 2004
- RE: Resolution to Issue 243? Joseph Salowey, July 5 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.