| Re: Proposed Resolution of Issue 253: AAA-Key Name is Misleading | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:54:27 -0400 (EDT) | |
Bernard Aboba wrote:
--Jari
Since I agree with Joe's comments, it pains me that the term "AAA-Key" is used in RFC 3748, and therefore I don't feel we can change the term in the EAP Key Management framework document.
However, we probably should expose language clarifying that the AAA-Key exists even where there is no AAA server (how is that for obfuscation?).
I think that is all we can do. Too bad, but can't be helped.
--Jari
-
Proposed Resolution of Issue 253: AAA-Key Name is Misleading Bernard Aboba, June 30 2004
- Re: Proposed Resolution of Issue 253: AAA-Key Name is Misleading Jari Arkko, June 30 2004
- Re: Proposed Resolution of Issue 253: AAA-Key Name is Misleading Bernard Aboba, June 30 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.