| Issue 245: EAP Restart Issue | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba |
|
| Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 11:52:58 -0400 (EDT) | |
In going over the discussion on Issue 241, John Vollbrecht made a suggestion for a change to RFC 3748 that I think corrects an oversight. As the document is now Author 48 hours, it is still possible to correct the problem if the WG approves. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Issue 245: EAP Restart Issue Submitter name: John Vollbrecht Submitter email address: jrv [at] umich.edu Date first submitted: 5/7/2004 Reference: http://mail.frascone.com/pipermail/eap/2004-May/002460.html Document: RFC2284bis-09 Comment type: T Priority: S Section: 4.1 Rationale/Explanation of issue: Section 4.1 of RFC 3748 states: "Additional Request packets MUST be sent until a valid Response packet is received, or an optional retry counter expires." Where the lower layer terminates the initial session and causes a restart, if EAP knows that the lower layer is terminated then I am not sure why it would continue to resend. Perhaps we should change this to: "Additional Request packets MUST be sent until a valid Response packet is received, an optional retry counter expires, or a lower layer failure indication is received."
-
Issue 245: EAP Restart Issue Bernard Aboba, June 6 2004
-
Re: Issue 245: EAP Restart Issue Jari Arkko, June 6 2004
-
Re: Issue 245: EAP Restart Issue Henrik Levkowetz, June 6 2004
- Re: Issue 245: EAP Restart Issue Florent Bersani, June 8 2004
- Re: Issue 245: EAP Restart Issue Jari Arkko, June 10 2004
-
Re: Issue 245: EAP Restart Issue Henrik Levkowetz, June 6 2004
-
Re: Issue 245: EAP Restart Issue Jari Arkko, June 6 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.