| RE: Relationship between AAA-Key and MSK/EMSK | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Nick Petroni (npetroni |
|
| Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:28:50 -0500 (EST) | |
> [Joe] I still think the quantity AAA-Key is not well defined. I'm not [np] Joe, I couldn't agree more. I welcome some discussion on the topic. > quite sure what AAA-key is supposed to represent. What is it used for? [np] I think it represents the trust relationship between the AP and the AAA...*something* has to be transferred so that the AP is in the loop. Where this comes from and how it is used should, indeed, be clearly defined. > Today it is used for link-layer-encryption and it is the MSK. Using > this key for other purposes may lead to loss of computational [np] Yes, this is for certain. Is it possible to make the MSK/AAA only for link-layer-encryption and use the EMSK for all other things? I think you suggested something similar to this before, but I'm not sure I understood completely. > independence and result in problems. The use of the work AAA-key is > misleading in the context it is currently being used. I think it would [np] yeah, I think AAA key is the wrong term as well. Regards, nick
- RE: Relationship between AAA-Key and MSK/EMSK, (continued)
- RE: Relationship between AAA-Key and MSK/EMSK Joseph Salowey, February 9 2004
-
RE: Relationship between AAA-Key and MSK/EMSK Nick Petroni, March 16 2004
- Re: Relationship between AAA-Key and MSK/EMSK Jari Arkko, March 17 2004
- RE: Relationship between AAA-Key and MSK/EMSK Joseph Salowey, March 17 2004
- RE: Relationship between AAA-Key and MSK/EMSK Nick Petroni, March 17 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.