eap Mailing List: RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-walker-ieee802-req-00.txt]

hi all, 

thanks for the draft. i was not surprised about the requirements except
for one:

[3]  Synchronization of state.  This corresponds to the "Protected
     result indication" security claim defined in [RFC2284bis], Section
     7.2.1.

why is this suddenly a MUST requirement? 

ciao
hannes

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.arkko [at] piuha.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 04, 2004 10:24 PM
> To: eap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [eap] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-walker-ieee802-req-00.txt]
> 
> 
> 

RE: [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-walker-ieee802-req-00.txt]	<– Date –> <– Thread –>
From: Hannes Tschofenig (Hannes.Tschofenigsiemens.com)
Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2004 09:30:34 -0500 (EST)

eap Mailing List
View Index by: Date - Thread - Author