| Re: Discrepancies between 802.1XREV and RFC 2248bis | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba |
|
| Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 17:41:20 -0500 (EST) | |
> I agree that this should be done. It is in addition to the small changes > that Jim Burns has described. I also realize this is late and am not sure > how it should be handled. Do we have a proposal for a revised Section 6.7 of 802.1X-REV? If not, do we need to come up with one?
-
Discrepancies between 802.1XREV and RFC 2248bis Bernard Aboba, January 19 2004
-
Re: Discrepancies between 802.1XREV and RFC 2248bis John Vollbrecht, January 19 2004
- Re: Discrepancies between 802.1XREV and RFC 2248bis Bernard Aboba, January 19 2004
-
Re: Discrepancies between 802.1XREV and RFC 2248bis John Vollbrecht, January 19 2004
-
Re: Discrepancies between 802.1XREV and RFC 2248bis Jim Burns, January 19 2004
-
Re: Discrepancies between 802.1XREV and RFC 2248bis Bernard Aboba, January 19 2004
- Re: Discrepancies between 802.1XREV and RFC 2248bis Jim Burns, January 20 2004
- Strawman for a modified section 6.7 for IEEE 802.1XRev Jim Burns, January 21 2004
-
Re: Discrepancies between 802.1XREV and RFC 2248bis Bernard Aboba, January 19 2004
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.