eap Mailing List: RE: Resolution of 802.1X/EAP-SM issue

[Bernard Aboba (aboba]

Thanks, Paul.  Are there any objections to resolving the issue this way?

On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1) wrote:

>
> I think, at the end of the day, concerning what documents needs what
> changing...  We could get away with no changes in either document, but since
> EAP-SM is still in more of a development stage, it would be helpful to
> include some discussion around the keyAvailable signal that indicates this
> signal is sufficient for a pass-thru authenticator to know the remote peer
> has accepted the mutual authentication (or something to that nature)...
>
> I believe we are all agreeing the eapRemoteSuccess is not needed, and thus,
> 802.1X is not waiting for any specific updates to the EAP-SM document.  The
> above recommendation would simply help capture the conclusions we have come
> to...
>
> Paul