| RE: RE: [eap] Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (bernarda |
|
| Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 22:22:49 -0600 (CST) | |
Title: [802.1] RE: [eap] Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation
Hope everyone had a
joyous thanksgiving holiday.
To clarify, Issue 204 was filed against the EAP State Machine
document in order to address a problem in the EAP authenticator state
machine pointed out in the resolution of Comment 15 on the IEEE 802.1aa
D7.1 ballot. The EAP issues list is available here:
The EAP WG discussion of Issue 204 is available starting
here:
The resolution to Issue 15 pointed out an asymmetry in the
operation of a pass-through authenticator and a non-passthrough authenticator
with respect to peer-to-peer operation. Since in EAP the two cases are
supposed to behave identically with respect to the on-the-wire protocol, this is
believed to represent a bug in the operation of the authenticator state machine,
as well as a potential difficiency in AAA, which may require the
definition of a new attribute.
A proposed fix to the EAP authenticator SM which would also affect
the 802.1X/EAP state machine interface, is available here:
RFC 2284bis sections 2.3 and 2.4 were posted to the list for
reference purposes, since they discuss the authenticator pass-through model and
peer-to-peer operation in general, even they do not discuss the authenticator
state machine or the proposed fixes to it. The entire text of RFC 2284bis-07
(which has now completed IETF last call) is available for inspection here:
-
RE: RE: [eap] Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation Bernard Aboba, December 2 2003
- RE: RE: [eap] Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation CONGDON,PAUL (HP-Roseville,ex1), December 3 2003
- RE: RE: [eap] Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation Bernard Aboba, December 8 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.