| Re: network discovery & selection: problem definition | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Yoshihiro Ohba (yohba |
|
| Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:24:37 -0600 (CST) | |
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 12:09:38AM +0200, Jari Arkko wrote: > > If the above observation is correct, I don't see any problem with this > > in terms of security. > > Michael started from a case where Gamma was advertising "Delta" > instead. He argued that the protocols should be able to prevent > such lies. I agreed. I agree that the lying NAS problem is a security issue in general. But what I'd like to mention is that the Gamma/Delta coffeshop example might not be an appropriate example for explaining the lyning NAS problem. Yoshihiro Ohba > > The rest is up to the user. > > --Jari >
- Re: network discovery & selection: problem definition, (continued)
- Re: network discovery & selection: problem definition Michael Richardson, December 1 2003
- Re: network discovery & selection: problem definition Jari Arkko, December 1 2003
- Re: network discovery & selection: problem definition Yoshihiro Ohba, December 1 2003
- Re: network discovery & selection: problem definition Jari Arkko, December 1 2003
- Re: network discovery & selection: problem definition Yoshihiro Ohba, December 1 2003
-
Re: network discovery & selection: problem definition Jari Arkko, December 10 2003
- Re: network discovery & selection: problem definition Alper Yegin, December 11 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.