| RE: Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba |
|
| Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 12:32:35 -0600 (CST) | |
> [Joe] So the protected result is not just signaling that the > authentication was successful, but also that the peer has authorized the > opening of its port. If the Peer actually wanted to do bi-drection > authenticaiton perhaps using a different EAP method then it wouldn't > send a protected result indication of succss even if the first method > succeeded? I think those are orthogonal issues. The peer would send a protected result indication for the initial method. The authenticator would then assume that the peer was happy so that it would not ask the to authenticate to the peer (e.g. by sending an EAPOL-Start). But the peer could always send an EAP-Request if it wanted to do bi-drectional authentication for some reason.
- RE: Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation, (continued)
- RE: Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation Bernard Aboba, November 26 2003
- RE: Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation Joseph Salowey, November 26 2003
- RE: Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation Bernard Aboba, November 26 2003
- RE: Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation Joseph Salowey, November 26 2003
- RE: Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation Bernard Aboba, November 26 2003
- RE: Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation Bernard Aboba, November 25 2003
- RE: Issue 204: Peer-to-peer operation Nick Petroni, December 3 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.