| Re: review of draft-salowey-eap-key-deriv-02.txt | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Jari Arkko (jari.arkko |
|
| Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 14:27:22 -0600 (CST) | |
Joseph Salowey wrote:
--Jari
3. I'm not sure I like the idea of EMSK Name being derived from KDF(EMSK), if there are alternatives. Would it be possible to name the EMSK by the EAP SA Name defined in eap-keying (derived from nonces), concanated with, say, "EMSK". Similarly, we could name each AMSK as the name of the EMSK, concatenated with "AMSK" and the key label and application data?
[Joe] I don't like the proposal either. The problem is that the EAP SA name is not concretely defined. I'm not sure you can define this for all methods in general. We need to place a requirement on methods that if they are going to generate additional keys they must also export an EAP-SA name.
Yes, that's right. Ok, I'll settle for your current text then on that.
--Jari
-
review of draft-salowey-eap-key-deriv-02.txt Jari Arkko, November 8 2003
-
RE: review of draft-salowey-eap-key-deriv-02.txt Joseph Salowey, November 19 2003
- Re: review of draft-salowey-eap-key-deriv-02.txt Jari Arkko, November 19 2003
-
RE: review of draft-salowey-eap-key-deriv-02.txt Joseph Salowey, November 19 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.