eap Mailing List: RE: binding draft issues 64, 65, 70, 88, 89, 123, new1, new2

[Puthenkulam, Jose P (jose.p.puthenkulam]

Thanks Jari & Bernard for help in closing the old issues.

Also thanks for your detailed review of the 04 draft. Will try to
address them in the next revision.

Regarding the section 4 reference solution, will try to see how best to
address your suggestions.

best regards,
jose

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eap-admin [at] frascone.com [mailto:eap-admin [at] frascone.com] 
> On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 9:56 AM
> To: eap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: Re: [eap] binding draft issues 64, 65, 70, 88, 89, 
> 123, new1, new2
> 
> 
> > I'm fine with the resolutions of issues 88, 89, 123
> > which I filed myself or were filed by my colleagues.
> 
> OK. I've marked these as resolved.
> 
> > I'm also personally fine with the resolutions of
> > the other open issues 64, 65, 70, though it would
> > be better if Bernard and Dan could also confirm that
> > they are OK with them.
> 
> I believe that Issue 65 and 70 are resolved, but the 
> organization of the
> first section still needs work so I will keep #64 open.
> 
> > I would suggest deleting section 4 and only keep a some
> > key general parts from it.
> 
> I agree.  Much of the material in this section belongs in the 
> PEAP draft
> (and in fact seems to have been copied there in the latest version).
> 
> All that is really needed here is general guidance on how a 
> solution can
> be constructed.  There are a number of other WGs now dealing 
> with the MiTM
> problem (IKEv2, NFS CCM, etc.) so that this could be 
> generally helpful.
> _______________________________________________
> eap mailing list
> eap [at] frascone.com
> http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
>