| Re: binding draft issues 64, 65, 70, 88, 89, 123, new1, new2 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
From: Bernard Aboba (aboba internaut.com)
|
|
| Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 12:32:59 -0600 (CST) | |
> I'm fine with the resolutions of issues 88, 89, 123 > which I filed myself or were filed by my colleagues. OK. I've marked these as resolved. > I'm also personally fine with the resolutions of > the other open issues 64, 65, 70, though it would > be better if Bernard and Dan could also confirm that > they are OK with them. I believe that Issue 65 and 70 are resolved, but the organization of the first section still needs work so I will keep #64 open. > I would suggest deleting section 4 and only keep a some > key general parts from it. I agree. Much of the material in this section belongs in the PEAP draft (and in fact seems to have been copied there in the latest version). All that is really needed here is general guidance on how a solution can be constructed. There are a number of other WGs now dealing with the MiTM problem (IKEv2, NFS CCM, etc.) so that this could be generally helpful.
-
binding draft issues 64, 65, 70, 88, 89, 123, new1, new2 Jari Arkko, November 3 2003
- Re: binding draft issues 64, 65, 70, 88, 89, 123, new1, new2 Bernard Aboba, November 3 2003
- RE: binding draft issues 64, 65, 70, 88, 89, 123, new1, new2 Puthenkulam, Jose P, November 3 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.