| RE: interpretation of the identity response | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Adrangi, Farid (farid.adrangi |
|
| Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 20:52:54 -0600 (CST) | |
|
Leaving the processing totally up to the mechanism may lead to some interoperability issues. I like your preferred way to use the identity response for routing purposes only. BR, Farid
-----Original Message-----
I think the processing of the identity response is up to the mechanism. If the NAI is decorated in non-standard means that is not known to the home AAA this can be a problem (it is also not within the NAI specification). Many mechanisms have a way to request or determine identity independent of the EAP identity response (EAP-SIM,EAP-AKA,EAP-TLS,EAP-MCSHAPv2). I If I had my preference I would use the identity response for routing only and ignore the user identity in the identity response. It should be a recommendation that mechanisms provide a way to obtain identity outside of the identity response.
Joe
|
-
interpretation of the identity response Adrangi, Farid, October 29 2003
-
RE: interpretation of the identity response Joseph Salowey, October 29 2003
- RE: interpretation of the identity response Bernard Aboba, October 29 2003
- RE: interpretation of the identity response John Vollbrecht, October 29 2003
- RE: interpretation of the identity response Adrangi, Farid, October 29 2003
-
RE: interpretation of the identity response Joseph Salowey, October 29 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.