| EAP Keying Framework Editorial nits | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Nick Petroni (npetroni |
|
| Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 08:56:58 -0500 (CDT) | |
Typos/grammar errors in draft-ietf-eap-keying-00 Submitter name: Nick Petroni Submitter email address: npetroni [at] cs.umd.edu Date first submitted: October 15, 2003 Reference: Document: Keying Framework Comment type: E Priority: S Section: 2.1.2, 3.1 Rationale/Explanation of issue: Incorrect language, simple changes enclosed. Requested change: In section 2.1.2, second paragraph, change "cannot" to "can" In fact, the authenticator is not required to implement any EAP methods at all, nor cannot it be assumed to implement code specific to any EAP method. to In fact, the authenticator is not required to implement any EAP methods at all, nor can it be assumed to implement code specific to any EAP method. Requested change: In section 3.1, second full paragraph, change "may be" to "may" Some methods may be support "fast resume" by caching EAP SA state on the EAP peer and server. to Some methods may support "fast resume" by caching EAP SA state on the EAP peer and server.
- (no other messages in thread)
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.