RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement
From: Walker, Jesse (jesse.walkerintel.com)
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 04:18:24 -0500 (CDT)
Ill advised. EAP methods are outside the scope of the 802.11i PAR.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Glen Zorn [mailto:gwz [at] cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 10:24 AM
> To: 'Bernard Aboba'
> Cc: eap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: RE: [eap] Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement
> 
> 
> Bernard Aboba <mailto:aboba [at] internaut.com> writes:
> 
> >> The obvious problem is that this leaves EAP as essentially an empty
> >> framework, removing the basis for any but purely formal
> >> interoperability.  In addition, since AFAIK 802.11i doesn't specify
> >> any EAP method as mandatory (relying instead upon RFC 2284), it
> >> leaves them in the same boat.  Is this really desirable?
> > 
> > Since EAP MD5-Challenge is already illegal for use with 
> IEEE 802.11i,
> > they are already in this predicament, no? 
> 
> Is the use of EAP MD5-Challenge actually illegal or just ill-advised?
> 
> ~gwz
> 
> "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
> safety deserve neither..." 
> -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
> 
> "It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless
> they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets." 
> -- Voltaire
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> eap mailing list
> eap [at] frascone.com
> http://mail.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/eap
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.