| RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Glen Zorn (gwz |
|
| Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:24:13 -0500 (CDT) | |
Bernard Aboba <mailto:aboba [at] internaut.com> writes: >> The obvious problem is that this leaves EAP as essentially an empty >> framework, removing the basis for any but purely formal >> interoperability. In addition, since AFAIK 802.11i doesn't specify >> any EAP method as mandatory (relying instead upon RFC 2284), it >> leaves them in the same boat. Is this really desirable? > > Since EAP MD5-Challenge is already illegal for use with IEEE 802.11i, > they are already in this predicament, no? Is the use of EAP MD5-Challenge actually illegal or just ill-advised? ~gwz "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither..." -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 "It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets." -- Voltaire
-
Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Bernard Aboba, September 11 2003
-
RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Glen Zorn, September 12 2003
-
RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Bernard Aboba, September 12 2003
- RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Glen Zorn, September 12 2003
- RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Bernard Aboba, September 12 2003
- RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Glen Zorn, September 12 2003
-
RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Bernard Aboba, September 12 2003
-
RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Glen Zorn, September 12 2003
- RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Walker, Jesse, September 14 2003
- RE: Issue 174: Mandatory to Implement Walker, Jesse, September 14 2003
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.