eap Mailing List: Issue: Attacker or Adversary?

[DE BOURSETTY Benoît FTRD/DTL/ISS (benoit.deboursetty]

Submitter name: Benoit de Boursetty
Submitter email address: benoit.deboursetty [at] francetelecom.com
Date first submitted: April 25, 2003
Document: draft-ietf-eap-rfc2284bis-01.txt
Comment type: E
Priority: 1
Section: 7.1
Rationale/Explanation of issue:

In section 7.1, the word "adversary" and "attacker" are both used to talk about 
the same kind of person. It is the only place in the draft where "adversary" is 
used, every where else the word "attacker" is used. 

Also all issues are "[attacker|adversary] may" but number 4 is a "might" 
(offline attacks). Does it really seem less likely than other attacks?

Suggested Change:
Unless the above is a subtlety beyond my grasping of the English language:
s/adversary/attacker/
s/might/may/ in issue 4