| Re: Issue 185: DTLS Session Resumption is optional | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pasi.Eronen (Pasi.Eronen |
|
| Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:21:13 -0700 (PDT) | |
Scott Kelly wrote: > Suggesting slightly revised text: > > "Session resumption is typically used to establish the DTLS session > used for the data channel. Since the data channel uses different port > numbers than the control channel, the DTLS implementation on the WTP > MUST provide an interface that allows the CAPWAP module to request > session resumption despite the use of the different port numbers > (TLS implementations usually attempt session resumption only when > connecting to the same IP address and port number)." > > Pat may want to further wordsmith this to match the surrounding text > (which I don't have in front of me just now). Yes, this reads better than my attempt (where wording got complex because I tried to say that session resumption can be attempted, but it's just an attempt). Perhaps we could just add "Note that session resumption is not guaranteed to occur, and a full DTLS handshake may occur instead" to the end? Best regards, Pasi
- Re: Issue 185: DTLS Session Resumption is optional, (continued)
-
Re: Issue 185: DTLS Session Resumption is optional Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), September 16 2008
- Re: Issue 185: DTLS Session Resumption is optional Scott Kelly, September 16 2008
- Re: Issue 185: DTLS Session Resumption is optional Pasi.Eronen, September 16 2008
- Re: Issue 185: DTLS Session Resumption is optional Scott Kelly, September 16 2008
- Re: Issue 185: DTLS Session Resumption is optional Pasi.Eronen, September 16 2008
-
Re: Issue 185: DTLS Session Resumption is optional Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), September 16 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.