| Issue 169: What to do with QoS tags exceeding maximum | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:31:42 -0700 (PDT) | |
Pasi's comment was > Section 6.14 says that packets exceeding this priority are either dropped or "down-tagged" -- but it seems which of > these is done depends on WTP (and the AC can't even know what the WTP does). > Isn't this problematic for interoperability? Well... That's a good question. I suppose we could either make a decision in this group, or change the format of the frame in order to allow the AC to communicate to the WTP what behavior it should take. Any preference? If we opt to not change the frame formats, then I would opt for down-tagging. PatC
-
Issue 169: What to do with QoS tags exceeding maximum Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), July 30 2008
- Re: Issue 169: What to do with QoS tags exceeding maximum Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), August 13 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.