| Issue 168: DTLS and Retransmissions | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 15:52:51 -0700 (PDT) | |
Pasi's comment was: Section 2.4.1: "DTLS will never terminate the handshake due to non-responsiveness; instead, DTLS will continue to increase its back-off timer period" While RFC 4347 doesn't specify how long you should continue retransmitting, the intent certainly was not to continue indefinitely. Section 2.4.3 text about DTLS retransmissions is slightly inaccurate; DTLS handshake isn't strictly request/response, and both parties (not just the DTLS client) retransmit based on timers (in some situations). It is unclear to me as to whether these are simply observations, or request for change. That said, I would like either Charles or Scott to reply. PatC
-
Issue 168: DTLS and Retransmissions Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), July 30 2008
-
Re: Issue 168: DTLS and Retransmissions Charles Clancy, August 1 2008
-
Re: Issue 168: DTLS and Retransmissions Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), August 1 2008
- Re: Issue 168: DTLS and Retransmissions Pasi.Eronen, August 7 2008
- Re: Issue 168: DTLS and Retransmissions Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), August 13 2008
-
Re: Issue 168: DTLS and Retransmissions Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), August 1 2008
-
Re: Issue 168: DTLS and Retransmissions Charles Clancy, August 1 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.