Capwap Mailing List: Re: NEED WG Consensus: Issue 73: IESG Review Comment T32

[Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun]

OK, closing issue 73.

PatC 

-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca [at] avaya.com] 
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 12:05 AM
To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: RE: [Capwap] NEED WG Consensus: Issue 73: IESG Review Comment
T32

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:18 AM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] NEED WG Consensus: Issue 73: IESG Review Comment T32
> 
> All,
>  
> I want to make sure that no one objects to the removal of the WTP 
> Operational Statistics message element. I cannot for the life of me 
> figure out what it does, nor can the folks that implemented our code.
> So far both Margaret and Dan are OK with the proposal.
> 
> In this change, I would not renumber any of the message elements to 
> limit broader impact. We would leave the message element unused.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> PatC

Best is probably to mention in the spec that it is unused and reserved. 

Dan