Capwap Mailing List: Re: NEED WG Consensus: Issue 73: IESG Review Comment T32

[Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromasca]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] 
> Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 3:18 AM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] NEED WG Consensus: Issue 73: IESG Review Comment T32
> 
> All,
>  
> I want to make sure that no one objects to the removal of the 
> WTP Operational Statistics message element. I cannot for the 
> life of me figure out what it does, nor can the folks that 
> implemented our code.
> So far both Margaret and Dan are OK with the proposal.
> 
> In this change, I would not renumber any of the message 
> elements to limit broader impact. We would leave the message 
> element unused.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> PatC

Best is probably to mention in the spec that it is unused and reserved. 

Dan