| Re: Latest Status of CAPWAP Open Issues | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Margaret Wasserman (margaret |
|
| Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 10:32:31 -0700 (PDT) | |
Hi Pat, On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:12 PM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
Issue 73: T32. The IESG questioned whether the number of bits in a field of the WTP Operational Statistics is sufficient. Reading the message element, I couldn't really understand what this was trying to do, so I asked the LWAPP developers, and this was an idea that never turned into anything, and do not have any recommendations on how to make the language clearer. Since I have no idea what someone would use this for, I cannot really fix this message element - and would propose deleting it. I am ok leaving it in, but I'd like to see the text cleaned up, and would ask that whomever wants me to leave it in, provide text.
I prefer the message to be taken out.
FWIW, deleting this message element makes the most sense to me, too.
Margaret
-
Latest Status of CAPWAP Open Issues Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 19 2008
-
Re: Latest Status of CAPWAP Open Issues Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 19 2008
- Re: Latest Status of CAPWAP Open Issues Margaret Wasserman, June 19 2008
- Re: Latest Status of CAPWAP Open Issues Margaret Wasserman, June 19 2008
- Re: Latest Status of CAPWAP Open Issues Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 19 2008
-
Re: Latest Status of CAPWAP Open Issues Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 19 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.