| Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromasca |
|
| Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:15:54 -0700 (PDT) | |
OK with me. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 8:20 AM > To: David B. Nelson; capwap [at] frascone.com > Subject: Re: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 > > Ok, that sounds good. I have made the necessary changes > throughout the spec. > > <text> > 4.6.1. AC Descriptor > [...] > AC Information Type: Vendor specific encoding of AC > information. > The following enumerated values are supported. Both the > Hardware and Software Version sub-elements MUST be > included in > the AC Descriptor message element. > > 4.6.15. CAPWAP Transport Protocol > [...] > Transport: The transport to use for the CAPWAP data channel. The > following enumerated values are supported: > > 4.6.16. Data Transfer Data > [...] > Data Type: An 8-bit value the type of information being > sent. The > following enumerated values are supported: > > 4.6.17. Data Transfer Mode > [...] > Data Type: An 8-bit value the type of information being > requested. > The following enumerated values are supported: > > 4.6.23. Discovery Type > [...] > Discovery Type: An 8-bit value indicating how the WTP discovered > the AC. The following enumerated values are supported: > > 4.6.27. Image Data > [...] > Opcode: An 8-bit value representing the transfer opcode. The > following enumerated values are supported: > > 4.6.33. Radio Administrative State > [...] > Admin State: An 8-bit value representing the administrative state > of the radio. The default value for the Admin State field is > listed in Section 4.8.1. The following enumerated values are > supported: > > 4.6.34. Radio Operational State > [...] > Cause: When a radio is inoperable, the cause field contains the > reason the radio is out of service. The following enumerated > values are supported: > > 4.6.35. Result Code > [...] > Result Code: The following enumerated values are defined: > > 4.6.36. Returned Message Element > [...] > Reason: The reason why the configuration in the offending message > element could not be applied by the WTP. The following > enumerated > values are supported: > > 4.6.42. WTP Fallback > [...] > Mode: The 8-bit value indicates the status of automatic CAPWAP > fallback on the WTP. When enabled, if the WTP detects that its > primary AC is available, and that the WTP is not > connected to the > primary AC, the WTP SHOULD automatically disconnect from its > current AC and reconnect to its primary AC. If > disabled, the WTP > will only reconnect to its primary AC through manual > intervention > (e.g., through the Reset Request message). The default > value for > this field is specified in Section 4.8.11. The following > enumerated values are supported: > > 4.6.46. WTP MAC Type > [...] > MAC Type: The MAC mode of operation supported by the WTP. The > following enumerated values are supported: > > 4.6.49. WTP Radio Statistics > [...] > Last Failure Type: The last WTP failure. The following > enumerated > values are supported: > > 4.6.50. WTP Reboot Statistics > [...] > Last Failure Type: The failure type of the most recent > WTP failure. > The following enumerated values are supported: > > </text> > > PatC > </text> > > -----Original Message----- > From: David B. Nelson [mailto:dnelson [at] elbrysnetworks.com] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 9:35 AM > To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com > Subject: Re: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 > > > No, this is not a bitmask. I'm not actually sure how to explicitely > > state it isn't a bitmask, because in my mind any field is not a > > bitmask unless it is explicitely stated, so I will use the term > numerical. > > Or maybe the term "enumerated value"? > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap >
-
CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 16 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 David B. Nelson, June 16 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 19 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 19 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 David B. Nelson, June 16 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 16 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 Margaret Wasserman, June 17 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T5 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.