| Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T20 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:40:31 -0700 (PDT) | |
OK, well I'm getting conflicting requests from the AD and the chair, so I need the two of you to agree on a path forward. PatC -----Original Message----- From: Margaret Wasserman [mailto:margaret [at] thingmagic.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 8:54 AM To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) Cc: capwap [at] frascone.com Subject: Re: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T20 Again, I do not see any value in renumbering fields at this point. We can always use 0 later if we run out... Margaret On Jun 16, 2008, at 11:35 AM, Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) wrote: > All, > > Here is the IESG Review Comment: > > T20 - Section 4.6.16, 4.6.17, 4.6.33, 4.6.36, 4.6.42, 4.6.43 - why > do the encoded > values start from 1 and not from 0? > > There is actually no reason why the values did not start at zero. I > will make the changes to renumber the values to start at zero (0). The > only one I disagree with is 4.6.43, because this is a bit field, but I > noticed that the text did not explicitely call for a bit field, so I > also made the necessary change. > > <text> > 4.6.16. Data Transfer Data > [...] > Data Type: An 8-bit value the type of information being sent. > The > following values are supported: > > 0 - WTP Crash Data > > 1 - WTP Memory Dump > > 4.6.17. Data Transfer Mode > [...] > Data Type: An 8-bit value the type of information being > requested. > The following values are supported: > > 0 - WTP Crash Data > > 1 - WTP Memory Dump > > 4.6.33. Radio Administrative State > [...] > Admin State: An 8-bit value representing the administrative state > of the radio. The default value for the Admin State field is > listed in Section 4.8.1. The following values are supported: > > 0 - Enabled > > 1 - Disabled > > 4.6.36. Returned Message Element > [...] > Reason: The reason why the configuration in the offending message > element could not be applied by the WTP. > > 0 - Unknown Message Element > > 1 - Unsupported Message Element > > 2 - Unknown Message Element Value > > 3 - Unsupported Message Element Value > > 4.6.42. WTP Fallback > [...] > > Mode: The 8-bit value indicates the status of automatic CAPWAP > fallback on the WTP. When enabled, if the WTP detects that its > primary AC is available, and that the WTP is not connected to > the > primary AC, the WTP SHOULD automatically disconnect from its > current AC and reconnect to its primary AC. If disabled, the > WTP > will only reconnect to its primary AC through manual > intervention > (e.g., through the Reset Request message). The default value > for > this field is specified in Section 4.8.10. The following values > are supported: > > 0 - Enabled > > 1 - Disabled > > Frame Tunnel Mode: The Frame Tunnel mode specifies the tunneling > modes for station data that are supported by the WTP. The > following > values are supported for this bit field: > > <text> > > PatC > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
-
CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T20 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 16 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T20 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 16 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T20 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T20 Margaret Wasserman, June 17 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T20 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T20 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 19 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T20 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 16 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.