| Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T40 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:34:56 -0700 (PDT) | |
OK, closing issue 81. PatC -----Original Message----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca [at] avaya.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 10:58 AM To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com Subject: RE: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T40 OK with me. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:08 PM > To: capwap [at] frascone.com > Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T40 > > All, > > Here is the IESG Review Comment: > > T40 - The same section should include information about impact on > network traffic. > What is the extra level of traffic that is expected by introducing > and deploying > CAPWAP? Is there any limit of AC load that needs to be taken into > consideration in > order to avoid congestion on the network or on the AC? > Probably this section should > be renamed to also cover Operational considerations, > > I have added the following paragraph to the section, along with the > modified section name: > > <text> > 13. Operational Considerations > [...] > > The CAPWAP protocol's control channel is fairly light weight from > a traffic perspective. Once the WTP has been configured, the WTP > sends > periodic statistics. Further, the specification calls for a > keepalive > packet to be sent on the protocol's data channel to make sure that > any > possible middleboxes (e.g., NAT) maintain their UDP state. > The overhead > associated with the control and data channel is not expected to > impact > network traffic. That said, the CAPWAP protocol does allow for the > frequency of these packets to be modified through the > DataChannelKeepAlive and StatisticsTimer (see section 4.7.2 and > section 4.7.14, respectively). > </text> > > PatC > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap >
-
CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T40 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T40 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 18 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T40 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T40 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 18 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.