Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhouncisco.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
OK, closing issue 66.

PatC 

-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca [at] avaya.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 5:18 AM
To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: RE: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25

Yes, sorry for the confusion. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25
> 
> All,
> 
> Here is the IESG Review Comment:
> 
>    T25 - Section 4.6.29 - what is the max length of the Value field?
> 
> I suspect the commentor really meant 4.6.28, which was addressed by 
> comment T24. This is therefore a duplicate entry, and will be marked 
> as invalid.
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.