| Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:22:57 -0700 (PDT) | |
OK, closing issue 62. PatC -----Original Message----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca [at] avaya.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 5:12 AM To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com Subject: RE: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21 OK with me. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM > To: capwap [at] frascone.com > Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21 > > All, > > Here is the IESG Review Comment: > > T21 - Section 4.6.18, 4.6.20 - what is the max number of entries in > the array (and > thus the max length of the respective MAC Address fields)? > > I have made the necessary changes, based on choosing a maximum number > of 1024. > > <text> > 4.6.18. Decryption Error Report > [...] > Num of Entries: The number of instances of the Type/MAC Addresses > fields in the array. This field MUST NOT exceed the value of > 1024. > > 4.6.20. Delete MAC ACL Entry > [...] > Num of Entries: The number of instances of the Type/MAC Addresses > fields in the array. This field MUST NOT exceed the value of > 1024. > </text> > > PatC > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap >
-
CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 16 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 17 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 17 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.