Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhouncisco.com)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:22:57 -0700 (PDT)
OK, closing issue 62.

PatC 

-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca [at] avaya.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 5:12 AM
To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: RE: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21

OK with me.

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T21
> 
> All,
>  
> Here is the IESG Review Comment:
> 
>    T21 - Section 4.6.18, 4.6.20 - what is the max number of entries in

> the array (and
>    thus the max length of the respective MAC Address fields)? 
> 
> I have made the necessary changes, based on choosing a maximum number 
> of 1024.
> 
> <text>
> 4.6.18.  Decryption Error Report
> [...]
>    Num of Entries:   The number of instances of the Type/MAC Addresses
>       fields in the array. This field MUST NOT exceed the value of 
> 1024.
> 
> 4.6.20.  Delete MAC ACL Entry
> [...]
>    Num of Entries:   The number of instances of the Type/MAC Addresses
>       fields in the array. This field MUST NOT exceed the value of 
> 1024.
> </text>
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.