Capwap Mailing List: Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T27

[Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun]

OK, closing issue 68.

PatC 

-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca [at] avaya.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 1:40 PM
To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: RE: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review T27

OK with me. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review T27
> 
> All,
> 
> Here is the IESG Review Comment:
> 
>    T27 - Section 4.6.36 - what is the max length of the Message 
> Element field?
> 
> I guess we have to assume that a message element could be 65535, so I 
> have made the necessary changes:
> 
> <text>
> 4.6.36.  Returned Message Element
> [...]
> 
>    0                   1                   2                   3
>    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>   |    Reason     |    Length     |       Message Element...
>   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
> 
>    Length:   The length of the Message Element field, which MUST
>       NOT exceed 65535 octets.
> </text>
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
>