Capwap Mailing List: Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T6

[Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun]

OK, closing issue 47.

PatC 

-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca [at] avaya.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:32 AM
To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: Re: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Issue T6

OK with me and thanks for letting me understand the issue. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Issue T6
> 
> Here is the IESG Issue:
> 
>    T6 - Section 4.3, page 48 - 'This is useful in packets sent from 
> the WTP to the AC,
>    when the native wireless frame format is converted to
> 802.3 by the WTP.'. Please 
>    explain why (is Radio MAC address useful)? Also, s/802.3/IEEE 802.3

> format/
> 
> I am proposing the changed second sentence in the following text to 
> address this issue:
> 
> <text>
>    Radio MAC Address:  This optional field contains the MAC address of
>       the radio receiving the packet.  Because the native wireless
>       frame format to IEEE 802.3 format causes the MAC address of the
>       WTP's radio to be lost, this field allows the address to be
>       communicated to the AC.   This field is only present if the
>       'M' bit is set.  The HLEN field assumes 4 byte alignment, and
>       this field MUST be padded with zeroes (0x00) if it is not 4 byte
>       aligned.
> </text>
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> 
_________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap

Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap