| Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T8 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 18:18:58 -0700 (PDT) | |
OK, closing issue 49. PatC -----Original Message----- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca [at] avaya.com] Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:30 AM To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com Subject: RE: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review T8 OK with me. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM > To: capwap [at] frascone.com > Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review T8 > > All, > > The following is the IESG Review comment: > > T8 - Session 4.4.1, pag. 50 - what is the max size of the Message > Element field? > Please detail > > I am proposing changing the text to the following: > > <text> > Message Element Length: The 8 bit Length field indicates the > number of bytes following the CAPWAP Header, with a > maximum size of 65535. > </text> > > PatC > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap >
-
CAPWAP IESG Review T8 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 16 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T8 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 16 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T8 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T8 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 16 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.