Capwap Mailing List: Re: CAPWAP IESG Review T9

[Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun]

Ok - closing issue 50.

PatC 

-----Original Message-----
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca [at] avaya.com] 
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 11:02 AM
To: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou); capwap [at] frascone.com
Subject: RE: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review T9

OK with me. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 8:04 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review T9
> 
> All,
> 
> Here is the IESG Review Comment:
> 
>    T9 - Section 4.4.2 - what is the max size of IEEE 802.3 frames that
> is being     
>    supported? Is IEEE 802.3as supported. Please detail
> 
> I am proposing the following text:
> 
> <text>
> 4.4.2.  Data Payload
> [...]
> 
>    For 802.3 payload frames, the 802.3 frame is encapsulated 
> (excluding
>    the IEEE 802.3 FCS checksum).  If the encapsulated frame would 
> exceed
>    the transport layer's MTU, the sender is responsible for
>    fragmentation of the frame, as specified in Section 3.4. The CAPWAP
>    protocol can support IEEE 802.3 frames whose length is defined in
>    the IEEE 802.3as specification  [FRAME-EXT].
> 
> 17.1.  Normative References
> [...]
>    [FRAME-EXT]
>               IEEE, "IEEE Standard 802.3as-2006", 2006.
> </text>
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
>