Capwap Mailing List: Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T16

[Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromasca]

OK with me. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2008 8:08 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T16
> 
> All,
> 
> Here is the IESG Review Comment:
> 
>    T16 - the document is not consistent in defining which one 
> of the configuration 
>    objects is to be saved in non-volatile memory. For example 
> in 4.6.7 it is mentioned 
>    that this message element information is not expected to 
> be saved in non-volatile 
>    memory - if this is an exception what is the rule?
> 
> Yes, it is an exception to the rule. However, to make this 
> point clear, I have added text to section 4.6:
> 
> <text>
> 4.6.  CAPWAP Protocol Message Elements
> [...]
>    Unless otherwise specified, any configuration information 
> sent by the
>    AC to the WTP MAY be saved to non-volatile storage (see section 8.1
>    for more information).
> </text>
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
>