| CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T16 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) (pcalhoun |
|
| Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 10:07:55 -0700 (PDT) | |
All, Here is the IESG Review Comment: T16 - the document is not consistent in defining which one of the configuration objects is to be saved in non-volatile memory. For example in 4.6.7 it is mentioned that this message element information is not expected to be saved in non-volatile memory - if this is an exception what is the rule? Yes, it is an exception to the rule. However, to make this point clear, I have added text to section 4.6: <text> 4.6. CAPWAP Protocol Message Elements [...] Unless otherwise specified, any configuration information sent by the AC to the WTP MAY be saved to non-volatile storage (see section 8.1 for more information). </text> PatC
-
CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T16 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T16 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 18 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T16 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T16 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 18 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.