Re: CAPWAP IESG Issue T2
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromascaavaya.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:21:45 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, this makes the goal more clear, OK with me. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Issue T2
> 
> All,
> 
> The issue provided by the IESG states:
>     T2 - Section 1.1 - Layer 2 and radio technology 
> independence and extensibility 
>     seem to me to be major goals of CAPWAP to the same extent 
> as the three goals 
>     already mentioned. 
> 
> I believe the text already describes this in the third goal:
> 
>    3. To provide a generic encapsulation and transport mechanism,
>       enabling the CAPWAP protocol to be applied to many access point
>       types in the future, via a specific wireless binding.
> 
> However, given the reviewer did not catch on to this, perhaps 
> it isn't clear enough, so I am proposing the following text:
> 
>     3. To provide an extensible protocol that is not bound to
>        a specific wireless technology. Extensibility is provided
>        via a generic encapsulation and transport mechanism,
>        enabling the CAPWAP protocol to be applied to many access
>        point types in the future, via a specific wireless binding.
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.