| Re: IESG Review Comment T24 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromasca |
|
| Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:20:03 -0700 (PDT) | |
OK with me. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM > To: capwap [at] frascone.com > Subject: [Capwap] IESG Review Comment T24 > > All, > > Here is the IESG Review Comment: > > T24 - Sections 4.6.27, 4.6.28 - should not these two > messages include length of the > Value fields? > > Originally, this was not included, because it could be inferred. > However, I can imagine a software architecture where the > packet size is not known when the message elements are > parsed. So I have added them: > > <text> > 4.6.27. Image Data > [...] > > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Data Type | Data Length | Data .... > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > [...] > > Data: Length of data field, with a maximum size of 1024. > > Data: The Image Data field contains up to 1024 > characters. If the > block being sent is the last one, the Opcode is set to > 2. The AC > MAY opt to abort the data transfer by setting the Opcode to 5. > When the Opcode is 5, the Value field has a zero length. > > 4.6.28. Image Identifier > [...] > 0 1 2 3 > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Vendor Identifier | > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > | Value Length | Data... > > +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+ > [...] > > Data: Length of data field, with a maximum size of 65535. > > Data: A variable length UTF-8 encoded string containing the > firmware > identifier to be run on the WTP. > </text> > > PatC > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap >
-
IESG Review Comment T24 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 16 2008
- Re: IESG Review Comment T24 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 17 2008
- Re: IESG Review Comment T24 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: IESG Review Comment T24 Margaret Wasserman, June 17 2008
-
Re: IESG Review Comment T24 Margaret Wasserman, June 17 2008
- Re: IESG Review Comment T24 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
-
Re: IESG Review Comment T24 Margaret Wasserman, June 17 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.