| Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25 | <– Date –> <– Thread –> |
|
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromasca |
|
| Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:18:20 -0700 (PDT) | |
Yes, sorry for the confusion. Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] > Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM > To: capwap [at] frascone.com > Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25 > > All, > > Here is the IESG Review Comment: > > T25 - Section 4.6.29 - what is the max length of the Value field? > > I suspect the commentor really meant 4.6.28, which was > addressed by comment T24. This is therefore a duplicate > entry, and will be marked as invalid. > > PatC > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit: > http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap > > Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap >
-
CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 16 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25 Romascanu, Dan (Dan), June 17 2008
- Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25 Pat Calhoun (pacalhou), June 18 2008
Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.