Re: CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25
From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromascaavaya.com)
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 05:18:20 -0700 (PDT)
Yes, sorry for the confusion. 

Dan
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Calhoun (pacalhou) [mailto:pcalhoun [at] cisco.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:36 PM
> To: capwap [at] frascone.com
> Subject: [Capwap] CAPWAP IESG Review Comment T25
> 
> All,
> 
> Here is the IESG Review Comment:
> 
>    T25 - Section 4.6.29 - what is the max length of the Value field?
> 
> I suspect the commentor really meant 4.6.28, which was 
> addressed by comment T24. This is therefore a duplicate 
> entry, and will be marked as invalid.
> 
> PatC
> _________________________________________________________________
> To unsubscribe or modify your subscription options, please visit:
> http://lists.frascone.com/mailman/listinfo/capwap
> 
> Archives: http://lists.frascone.com/pipermail/capwap
> 

Results generated by Tiger Technologies using MHonArc.